Overview
Route Selection
Landowners
Permitting
Environmental Impacts
Construction
Public Involvement
Employment

Overview

What is the Northeast Reliability Interconnect?

The North American electric grid upon which our society relies for electric service is built on a backbone of large, interconnected high voltage transmission lines. The Northeast Reliability Interconnect (NRI) is a high voltage transmission line between the Bangor area and New Brunswick, Canada. Although Maine shares over 600 miles of border with Canada, previously only one major backbone transmission line linked the two regions and their electrical system operations. This second line will improve electric system reliability, stability and efficiency in addition to expanding competition and electric energy exchanges between New England and the Maritimes. The Maine section of the line is owned and operated by Bangor Hydro; the New Brunswick section of the line is owned and operated by New Brunswick Power.

Why is a new transmission line needed?

Central and northern Maine had been served by only one major transmission line, known as the MEPCO Line. This line has been in service for over 30 years and is nearing its engineering life expectancy. The NRI addresses the following problems that occur as a result of operating without any back up for only the single tie line connection with New Brunswick:

  • Dependence on a single northern transmission line compromises reliability for electric service. With just one line connecting northern Maine to the rest of New England, when an outage occurs, it can causes major disruptions.
  • Electric stability problems with the existing transmission line limit the ability to manage the electric system during a generator shutdown or transmission line outage, causing disruption to service in Maine and affecting power quality. Public agencies with responsibility for the reliability of the region’s electricity network have long been concerned about this issue.
  • Power exports on the existing line are restricted by capacity limits. Because Maine has surplus generating capacity that could be sold into Canada, particularly during the winter when that market’s demand for electricity is highest, this is a lost economic opportunity for Maine.
  • Maine generators are sometimes required to shut down due to transmission congestion.
  • Customers and generators in the Maine Public Service and Eastern Maine Electric Cooperative service territories are not directly connected to the Maine (and U.S.) electric grid.
  • The existing transmission line between Maine and New Brunswick does not function efficiently at peak flows. Consequently, 5% of the electricity that customers pay for is converted to heat and is lost during transfer. On an annual basis, this is equivalent to the energy consumption of 29,000 homes!

In addition to helping to solve these problems, the NRI allows increased energy transfers in both directions between Maine and the Maritimes. This provides access to a greater range of electricity supply options, stimulating competition and contributing to improved market conditions for Maine electricity consumers.

Wasn’t a similar project on the drawing boards several years ago?

Bangor Hydro has explored the feasibility of a second electric transmission line between Maine and New Brunswick for over 15 years. In the early 1990’s, federal and state permits for the lines were granted to Bangor Hydro. Bangor Hydro attempted to renew existing permits for a second transmission route to New Brunswick in the late 1990’s, but withdrew the renewal from consideration amidst concerns that alternative routes had not been fully explored.

Back to Top

Route Selection 

How was the Route Selected ?
Given the multitude of factors that must be evaluated, selecting the route for a transmission line is a complex task. Bangor Hydro considered numerous factors to arrive at a balanced route selection decision, including: landowner concerns; electrical system planning, engineering and reliability issues; environmental impacts; local, state and federal regulatory requirements and policies and the cost of route alternatives. Involvement of stakeholders provided valuable site-specific information and a better understanding of local and regional concerns.Five possible alternatives were evaluated, and the Consolidated Corridors Route emerged from that analysis as the superior route. Key factors in eliminating the other route alternatives include:

  • The MEPCO-South Alternative would only be consolidated with existing utility corridors for approximately 66% of the route, versus approximately 84% for the Consolidated Corridors Route, and would impact  approximately 200 more landowners than the Consolidated Corridors Route.
  • The MEPCO Alternative option requires approximately 80 miles of additional transmission line to connect Keswick with Point Lepreau in Canada. The increase in costs and environmental impacts associated with construction of a transmission line from Keswick to Point Lepreau, coupled with the reduction in reliability and system performance associated with routing the line through Keswick instead of directly to Point Lepreau render this alternative impracticable. 
  • The Route 9 Alternative would require the greatest amount of virgin right-of-way, impact the greatest number of landowners and is inconsistent with the goal to co-locate linear infrastructure projects.
  • The Previously Permitted Route Alternative would create 62 miles of new corridor, with resulting environmental impacts, and is inconsistent with the preferences of the two largest landowners who collectively own approximately 73% of the route.

Back to Top

Landowners

What happens to the landowners who will be affected by the line?

Bangor Hydro contacted every landowner with property along the route to provide the details and explain the process. Bangor Hydro typically purchases a right of way easement from individual landowners. The purchase price is based on fair market value. A significant portion of the right-of-way for this project was already owned by BHE or MEPCO for many years. The final rights needed were all secured before construction started. If you would like to talk with one of our project team members now, please contact us at 1-800-499-6600 ext. 2568.

Back to Top

Permitting

What major permits were required for the Northeast Reliability Interconnect?

Federal

  • U.S. Department of Energy - Presidential Permit
  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Section 404 Wetlands Permit under the Clean Water Act

State

  • State of Maine Department of Environmental Protection - Site Location of Development, Natural Resources Protection Act Permits and Federal 401 Water Quality Certification
  • Maine Public Utilities Commission - Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity

Municipal

  • Municipal Approvals as required by nine towns.

What did the Department of Environmental Protection consider under the Natural Resource Protection Act and Site Location of Development Law?

The Department of Environmental Protection has reviewed the project to ensure compliance with public environmental standards associated with, among other issues, freshwater wetlands, great ponds, rivers, streams and brooks, and significant wildlife habitat. Bangor Hydro demonstrated that the project will not cause unreasonable erosion or sedimentation, will not cause unreasonable adverse impacts to wildlife and habitat and will not unreasonably interfere with existing scenic, aesthetic and recreational uses.

How long is the permitting process?

The full permitting process spanned approximately two years.

Back to Top

Environmental Impacts

What are the environmental impacts of a transmission line?

Through careful siting and well-planned construction, Bangor Hydro will minimize the environmental impacts of the transmission line. The environmental impacts of a transmission line stem largely from route location and the placement of the structures that support the line. Careful placement of structures to protect wetlands and other sensitive resources minimizes environmental impacts. Attention to route selection and structure design can also minimize environmental and aesthetic impacts. Wooden poles are the most common transmission line structure used in Maine because they can be directly embedded in the ground without the need for foundations. Wooden poles blend in with the environment better than taller, steel lattice type structures and their height is usually near the tree line which further minimizes visual impacts. Examples of environmental impacts that Bangor Hydro was also particularly sensitive to include clearing forests, affecting deer wintering areas and wetlands, crossing water bodies, and working in areas with rare, threatened or endangered species.

What construction methods are utilized to minimize environmental impacts?

Bangor Hydro utilizes a number of design and construction methods to minimize environmental impacts. These methods include designing the structure placement in order to span wetlands and water bodies, maintaining vegetative buffers along rivers and streams, and scheduling construction activities to avoid critical spawning/nesting periods for fish and wildlife. Work required in wetland areas is scheduled for winter when the surfaces are frozen. Appropriate construction techniques include the use of specialized tracked construction equipment to minimize soil disturbance, placement of wooden mats and temporary bridges if crossing of wetlands and water bodies is necessary, and adherence to a project specific erosion control plan.

Who will make sure the environment is protected during construction?

We are firmly committed to minimizing environmental impacts during construction. Bangor Hydro hired personnel to monitor all phases of construction to ensure compliance with environmental standards. In addition, the Maine Department of Environmental Protection and a third party inspector closely monitored all aspects of construction.

Back to Top

Construction

What construction methods are utilized to minimize environmental impacts?

Bangor Hydro utilizes a number of design and construction methods to minimize environmental impacts. These methods include designing the structure placement in order to span wetlands and water bodies, maintaining vegetative buffers along rivers and streams, and scheduling construction activities to avoid critical spawning/nesting periods for fish and wildlife. Work required in wetland areas is scheduled for winter when the surfaces are frozen. Appropriate construction techniques include the use of specialized tracked construction equipment to minimize soil disturbance, placement of wooden mats and temporary bridges if crossing of wetlands and water bodies is necessary, and adherence to a project specific erosion control plan.

Who will make sure the environment is protected during construction?

We are firmly committed to minimizing environmental impacts during construction. Bangor Hydro hired personnel to monitor all phases of construction to ensure compliance with environmental standards. In addition, the Maine Department of Environmental Protection and a third party inspector closely monitored all aspects of construction.

How long will it take to build the line?

Construction took approximately 18 months and was completed before the end of 2007.

Back to Top