Overview
Route Selection
Landowners
Permitting
Environmental Impacts
Construction
Public Involvement
Employment
What
is the Northeast Reliability Interconnect?
The
North American electric grid upon which our society relies
for electric service is built on a backbone of large, interconnected
high voltage transmission lines. The Northeast Reliability
Interconnect (NRI) is a high voltage transmission
line between the Bangor area and New Brunswick, Canada. Although
Maine shares over 600 miles of border with Canada, previously only one
major backbone transmission line linked the two regions and
their electrical system operations. This second line will improve
electric system reliability, stability and efficiency in addition
to expanding competition and electric energy exchanges between
New England and the Maritimes. The Maine section of the line is owned and operated by Bangor Hydro; the New
Brunswick section of the line is owned and operated
by New Brunswick Power.
Why
is a new transmission line needed?
Central
and northern Maine had been served by only one major transmission line,
known as the MEPCO Line. This line has been in service for
over 30 years and is nearing its engineering life expectancy.
The NRI addresses the following problems that occur as a
result of operating without any back up for only the single
tie line connection with New Brunswick:
- Dependence
on a single northern transmission line compromises reliability
for electric service. With just one line connecting northern
Maine to the rest of New England, when an outage occurs,
it can causes major disruptions.
- Electric
stability problems with the existing transmission line limit
the ability to manage the electric system during a generator
shutdown or transmission line outage, causing disruption
to service in Maine and affecting power quality. Public agencies
with responsibility for the reliability of the region’s
electricity network have long been concerned about this issue.
- Power
exports on the existing line are restricted by capacity limits.
Because Maine has surplus generating capacity that could
be sold into Canada, particularly during the winter when
that market’s demand for electricity is highest, this
is a lost economic opportunity for Maine.
- Maine
generators are sometimes required to shut down due to transmission
congestion.
- Customers
and generators in the Maine Public Service and Eastern Maine
Electric Cooperative service territories are not directly
connected to the Maine (and U.S.) electric grid.
- The
existing transmission line between Maine and New Brunswick
does not function efficiently at peak flows. Consequently,
5% of the electricity that customers pay for is converted
to heat and is lost during transfer. On an annual basis,
this is equivalent to the energy consumption of 29,000 homes!
In
addition to helping to solve these problems, the NRI allows increased energy transfers in both directions between
Maine and the Maritimes. This provides access to a greater
range of electricity supply options, stimulating competition
and contributing to improved market conditions for Maine electricity
consumers.
Wasn’t
a similar project on the drawing boards several years ago?
Bangor Hydro has explored the feasibility
of a second electric transmission line between Maine and New
Brunswick for over 15 years. In the early 1990’s, federal and state permits
for the lines were granted to Bangor Hydro. Bangor Hydro attempted
to renew existing permits for a second transmission route to
New Brunswick in the late 1990’s, but withdrew the renewal
from consideration amidst concerns that alternative routes
had not been fully explored.
Back
to Top
How was the Route Selected ?
Given the multitude of factors that must be evaluated, selecting the route for a transmission line is a complex task. Bangor Hydro considered numerous factors to arrive at a balanced route selection decision, including: landowner concerns; electrical system planning, engineering and reliability issues; environmental impacts; local, state and federal regulatory requirements and policies and the cost of route alternatives. Involvement of stakeholders provided valuable site-specific information and a better understanding of local and regional concerns.Five possible alternatives were evaluated, and the Consolidated Corridors Route emerged from that analysis as the superior route. Key factors in eliminating the other route alternatives include:
- The MEPCO-South Alternative would only be consolidated with existing utility corridors for approximately 66% of the route, versus approximately 84% for the Consolidated Corridors Route, and would impact approximately 200 more landowners than the Consolidated Corridors Route.
- The MEPCO Alternative option requires approximately 80 miles of additional transmission line to connect Keswick with Point Lepreau in Canada. The increase in costs and environmental impacts associated with construction of a transmission line from Keswick to Point Lepreau, coupled with the reduction in reliability and system performance associated with routing the line through Keswick instead of directly to Point Lepreau render this alternative impracticable.
- The Route 9 Alternative would require the greatest amount of virgin right-of-way, impact the greatest number of landowners and is inconsistent with the goal to co-locate linear infrastructure projects.
- The Previously Permitted Route Alternative would create 62 miles of new corridor, with resulting environmental impacts, and is inconsistent with the preferences of the two largest landowners who collectively own approximately 73% of the route.
Back
to Top
What
happens to the landowners who will be affected by the line?
Bangor Hydro contacted every
landowner with property along the route to provide the details
and explain the process. Bangor Hydro typically purchases a right of way
easement from individual landowners. The purchase price is
based on fair market value. A significant portion of the right-of-way for this project was already owned by BHE or MEPCO for many years. The final rights needed were all secured before construction started. If you would like to talk with
one of our project team members now, please contact us at
1-800-499-6600 ext. 2568.
Back
to Top
What
major permits were required for the Northeast Reliability
Interconnect?
Federal
- U.S. Department
of Energy - Presidential Permit
- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Section 404 Wetlands Permit under the Clean Water Act
State
- State
of Maine Department of Environmental Protection - Site
Location of Development, Natural Resources Protection Act
Permits and Federal 401 Water Quality Certification
- Maine
Public Utilities Commission - Certificate of Public Convenience
and Necessity
Municipal
- Municipal
Approvals as required by nine towns.
What
did the Department of Environmental Protection consider
under the Natural Resource Protection Act and Site Location
of Development Law?
The
Department of Environmental Protection has reviewed the project
to ensure compliance with public environmental standards
associated with, among other issues, freshwater wetlands,
great ponds, rivers, streams and brooks, and significant
wildlife habitat. Bangor Hydro demonstrated that the
project will not cause unreasonable erosion or sedimentation,
will not cause unreasonable adverse impacts to wildlife and
habitat and will not unreasonably interfere with existing
scenic, aesthetic and recreational uses.
How
long is the permitting process?
The full permitting process spanned approximately two years.
Back
to Top
What
are the environmental impacts of a transmission line?
Through
careful siting and well-planned construction, Bangor Hydro
will minimize the environmental impacts of the transmission
line. The environmental impacts of a transmission line stem
largely from route location and the placement of the structures that support
the line. Careful placement of structures to protect wetlands
and other sensitive resources minimizes environmental impacts.
Attention to route selection and structure design can also
minimize environmental and aesthetic impacts. Wooden poles
are the most common transmission line structure used in Maine
because they can be directly embedded in the ground without
the need for foundations. Wooden poles blend in with the
environment better than taller, steel lattice type structures
and their height is usually near the tree line which
further minimizes visual impacts. Examples of environmental
impacts that Bangor Hydro was also particularly sensitive
to include clearing forests, affecting deer wintering areas and wetlands,
crossing water bodies, and working in areas with rare, threatened
or endangered species.
What
construction methods are utilized to minimize environmental
impacts?
Bangor
Hydro utilizes a number of design and construction methods to minimize
environmental impacts. These methods include designing the
structure placement in order to span wetlands and water bodies,
maintaining vegetative buffers along rivers and streams,
and scheduling construction activities to avoid critical
spawning/nesting periods for fish and wildlife. Work required
in wetland areas is scheduled for winter when the surfaces
are frozen. Appropriate construction techniques include the
use of specialized tracked construction equipment to minimize
soil disturbance, placement of wooden mats and temporary bridges if crossing of
wetlands and water bodies is necessary, and adherence to
a project specific erosion control plan.
Who
will make sure the environment is protected during construction?
We
are firmly committed to minimizing environmental impacts
during construction. Bangor Hydro hired personnel to
monitor all phases of construction to ensure compliance with
environmental standards. In addition, the Maine Department
of Environmental Protection and a third party inspector
closely monitored all aspects of construction.
Back
to Top
What
construction methods are utilized to minimize environmental
impacts?
Bangor
Hydro utilizes a number of design and construction methods to minimize
environmental impacts. These methods include designing the
structure placement in order to span wetlands and water bodies,
maintaining vegetative buffers along rivers and streams,
and scheduling construction activities to avoid critical
spawning/nesting periods for fish and wildlife. Work required
in wetland areas is scheduled for winter when the surfaces
are frozen. Appropriate construction techniques include the
use of specialized tracked construction equipment to minimize
soil disturbance, placement of wooden mats and temporary bridges if crossing of
wetlands and water bodies is necessary, and adherence to
a project specific erosion control plan.
Who
will make sure the environment is protected during construction?
We
are firmly committed to minimizing environmental impacts
during construction. Bangor Hydro hired personnel to
monitor all phases of construction to ensure compliance with
environmental standards. In addition, the Maine Department
of Environmental Protection and a third party inspector
closely monitored all aspects of construction.
How
long will it take to build the line?
Construction
took approximately 18 months and was completed before the end of 2007.
Back
to Top |